Plum Optimax 8.0 vs Nokia 105 Plus (2022) Comparison

Plum Optimax 8.0

Price N/A

Nokia 105 Plus (2022)

6499.0

Plum Optimax 8.0 and Nokia 105 Plus (2022) comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Plum Optimax 8.0 and Nokia 105 Plus (2022) camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Plum Optimax 8.0 Rs N/A
Nokia 105 Plus (2022) Rs 6,499
Network
Technology GSM / HSPA GSM
2G Band GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G Band HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 N/A
Speed HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps N/A
Body
Dimensions 210.6 x 121.7 x 8.7 mm (8.29 x 4.79 x 0.34 in) 115.2 x 49.9 x 14.3 mm (4.54 x 1.96 x 0.56 in)
Weight 305 g (10.76 oz) 72 g (2.54 oz)
Sim Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) Single SIM (Mini-SIM) or Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by)
Display
Type IPS LCD TFT LCD, 65K colors
Size 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) 1.77 inches, 9.7 cm2 (~16.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~113 ppi density)
Platform
OS Android 5.1 (Lollipop) N/A
Chipset Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) Mediatek MT6261D
CPU Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 N/A
GPU Mali-400MP2 N/A
Memory
Card slot microSDHC (dedicated slot) microSDHC
Internal 8GB 1GB RAM 4MB, 4MB RAM
Main Camera
Single 5 MP N/A
Features HDR, panorama N/A
Video 720p@30fps N/A
Selfie Camera
Single 2 MP N/A
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack Yes Yes
Comms
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot No
Bluetooth 4.0, A2DP No
GPS Yes, with A-GPS N/A
NFC No No
Radio FM radio Wireless FM radio
USB USB 2.0 microUSB 1.1
Features
Sensors Accelerometer, gyro, proximity N/A
Battery
Type Li-Po 3400 mAh, non-removable Li-Ion 800 mAh, removable
Misc
Colors Black, White Red, Charcoal
Models N/A TA-1447, TA-1456

Plum Optimax 8.0 and Nokia 105 Plus (2022) comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Plum Optimax 8.0 and Nokia 105 Plus (2022) camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Network
Plum Optimax 8.0 Rs N/A
Nokia 105 Plus (2022) Rs 6,499
Technology
GSM / HSPA GSM
2G Band
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G Band
HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 N/A
4G Band
N/A N/A
5G Band
N/A N/A
Speed
HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps N/A
Body
Dimensions
210.6 x 121.7 x 8.7 mm (8.29 x 4.79 x 0.34 in) 115.2 x 49.9 x 14.3 mm (4.54 x 1.96 x 0.56 in)
Weight
305 g (10.76 oz) 72 g (2.54 oz)
Build
N/A N/A
Sim
Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) Single SIM (Mini-SIM) or Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by)
Display
Type
IPS LCD TFT LCD, 65K colors
Size
8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) 1.77 inches, 9.7 cm2 (~16.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution
800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~113 ppi density)
Platform
OS
Android 5.1 (Lollipop) N/A
Chipset
Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) Mediatek MT6261D
CPU
Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 N/A
GPU
Mali-400MP2 N/A
Memory
Card slot
microSDHC (dedicated slot) microSDHC
Internal
8GB 1GB RAM 4MB, 4MB RAM
Main Camera
Single
5 MP N/A
Dual
N/A N/A
Triple
N/A N/A
Quad
N/A N/A
Features
HDR, panorama N/A
Video
720p@30fps N/A
Selfie Camera
Single
2 MP N/A
Features
N/A N/A
Video
N/A N/A
Sound
Loudspeaker
Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack
Yes Yes
Comms
WLAN
Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot No
Bluetooth
4.0, A2DP No
GPS
Yes, with A-GPS N/A
NFC
No No
Radio
FM radio Wireless FM radio
USB
USB 2.0 microUSB 1.1
Features
Sensors
Accelerometer, gyro, proximity N/A
Battery
Type
Li-Po 3400 mAh, non-removable Li-Ion 800 mAh, removable
Charging
N/A N/A
Misc
Colors
Black, White Red, Charcoal
Models
N/A TA-1447, TA-1456

Plum Optimax 8.0 and Nokia 105 Plus (2022) comparison based on specs and price. You can also compare Plum Optimax 8.0 and Nokia 105 Plus (2022) camera, performance and reviews online to decide which mobile is best to buy in Pakistan.

Plum Optimax 8.0 Rs N/A
Nokia 105 Plus (2022) Rs 6,499
Network
Technology GSM / HSPA GSM
2G Band GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
3G Band HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 N/A
Speed HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps N/A
Body
Dimensions 210.6 x 121.7 x 8.7 mm (8.29 x 4.79 x 0.34 in) 115.2 x 49.9 x 14.3 mm (4.54 x 1.96 x 0.56 in)
Weight 305 g (10.76 oz) 72 g (2.54 oz)
Sim Dual SIM (Micro-SIM, dual stand-by) Single SIM (Mini-SIM) or Dual SIM (Mini-SIM, dual stand-by)
Display
Type IPS LCD TFT LCD, 65K colors
Size 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) 1.77 inches, 9.7 cm2 (~16.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Resolution 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) 120 x 160 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~113 ppi density)
Platform
OS Android 5.1 (Lollipop) N/A
Chipset Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) Mediatek MT6261D
CPU Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 N/A
GPU Mali-400MP2 N/A
Memory
Card slot microSDHC (dedicated slot) microSDHC
Internal 8GB 1GB RAM 4MB, 4MB RAM
Main Camera
Single 5 MP N/A
Features HDR, panorama N/A
Video 720p@30fps N/A
Selfie Camera
Single 2 MP N/A
Sound
Loudspeaker Yes Yes
3.5mm-jack Yes Yes
Comms
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot No
Bluetooth 4.0, A2DP No
GPS Yes, with A-GPS N/A
NFC No No
Radio FM radio Wireless FM radio
USB USB 2.0 microUSB 1.1
Features
Sensors Accelerometer, gyro, proximity N/A
Battery
Type Li-Po 3400 mAh, non-removable Li-Ion 800 mAh, removable
Misc
Colors Black, White Red, Charcoal
Models N/A TA-1447, TA-1456

Mobile Comparisons

Smart 7 HD Infinix Smart 7 HD
VS
Pop 7 Tecno Pop 7
View Comparison
V25e Vivo V25e
VS
V29e Vivo V29e
View Comparison
C22 Nokia C22
VS
Neo 6 Sparx Neo 6
View Comparison
Camon 18 Premier Tecno Camon 18 Premier
VS
F23 Oppo F23
View Comparison
V27 Vivo V27
VS
F21 Pro 5G Oppo F21 Pro 5G
View Comparison
 Galaxy A24 4G Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
VS
X9a Honor X9a
View Comparison
Galaxy A73 5G Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
VS
Mate 50 Huawei Mate 50
View Comparison
Note 12 G88 Infinix Note 12 G88
VS
C55 Realme C55
View Comparison
A58 Oppo A58
VS
Spark 10 Pro Tecno Spark 10 Pro
View Comparison
9RT OnePlus 9RT
VS
Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro 4G
View Comparison